Daniel Mora vs Luke Jacob Gamble Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W L W W L L L L
Form
W L W W L L L L L LHead-2-Head: Mora 1 - 0 Gamble
They have played 3 sets in total, with Mora winning 2 and Gamble winning 1. The last match between Mora and Gamble was at the M15 Santa Tecla, 01-10-2019, First, Hard with Daniel Mora getting the victory 4-6 6-3 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Daniel Mora | 1 |
| Luke Jacob Gamble | 0 |
M15 Santa Tecla(01-10-2019)
4
6
6
3
6
1
| Mora | Stats | Gamble |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| Ret. | Ranking | Ret. |
| Highest Rank | N/A | |
| 28 | Age | 30 |
| R | Plays | L |
| 0 | Titles | 0 |
| 46% (92-110) | Career Total W/L | 45% (27-33) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Agut VS Clar PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Boulter VS Paolini PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 6-3 6-1 |
Stats 
Daniel Mora
Player
Luke Jacob Gamble
72%
(
53 of
74)
1st Serve %
64%
(
52 of
81)
0
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
4
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
25 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
81)
84
Total Points Won
71
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 16 | Games Won | 10 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 7 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:53:0 | Average Match Time | 1:53:0 |
| 72% (53/74) | 1st Serve % | 64% (52/81) |
| 66% (35/53) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (31/52) |
| 67% (14/21) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (15/29) |
| 45% (5/11) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (2/4) |
| 43% (35/81) | Return Points Win % | 34% (25/74) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Daniel Mora Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 7-5 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 2-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 2-6 6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | |||
view more
Luke Jacob Gamble Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Alec Adamson
Player
Luke Jacob Gamble
56%
(
27 of
48)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
67%
(
18 of
27)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
76%
(
16 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Mora
Player
Luke Jacob Gamble
72%
(
53 of
74)
1st Serve %
64%
(
52 of
81)
0
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
4
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
25 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
81)
84
Total Points Won
71
|
4-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Felipe Mantilla
Player
Luke Jacob Gamble
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve %
68%
(
38 of
56)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
10 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
33 of
56)
59
Total Points Won
33
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Luke Jacob Gamble
80%
(
37 of
46)
1st Serve %
77%
(
37 of
48)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
17%
(
8 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Svensson
Player
Luke Jacob Gamble
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve %
77%
(
50 of
65)
7
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
72
Total Points Won
54
|
7-6(2) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gustav Hansson
Player
Luke Jacob Gamble
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve %
67%
(
33 of
49)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
11 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Luke Jacob Gamble
Player
Almir Nokic
72%
(
63 of
88)
1st Serve %
61%
(
45 of
74)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
72%
(
21 of
29)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
30 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
26 of
74)
84
Total Points Won
78
|
6-7(4) 6-3 10-7 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Luke Jacob Gamble
Player
Simon Birgerson
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve %
67%
(
48 of
72)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
57%
(
21 of
37)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
46%
(
23 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
41 of
72)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Eric Vanshelboim
Player
Luke Jacob Gamble
72%
(
66 of
92)
1st Serve %
71%
(
60 of
84)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
35 of
60)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
36 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
36 of
84)
92
Total Points Won
84
|
4-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Luke Jacob Gamble
Player
Oleg Khotkov
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve %
82%
(
32 of
39)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
15 of
19)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
75%
(
6 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
6 of
27)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
42
Total Points Won
24
|
6-2 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 46% (92/110) | Win/Loss | 45% (27/33) |
| 46% (199/235) | Sets Win/Loss | 48% (61/67) |
| 49% (1808/1892) | Games Win/Loss | 50% (577/570) |
| 42% (28/38) | Hard Win/Loss | 50% (19/19) |
| 47% (63/71) | Clay Win/Loss | 31% (5/11) |
| 50% (1/1) | Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (2/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) |
| 0.02 | Aces Per Game | 0.12 |
| 35 | Aces Total | 67 |
| 0.14 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.19 |
| 244 | Total Double Faults | 106 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 280.5 | Average Opponent Rank | 250.18 |
| 67% (2855/4254) | 1st Serve % | 68% (1267/1856) |
| 55% (1563/2855) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (812/1267) |
| 41% (576/1399) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (277/589) |
| 47% (178/375) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (66/150) |
| 39% (1600/4056) | Return Points Win % | 37% (671/1837) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 25% (5/15) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 48% (87/94) | Futures W/L | 45% (27/33) |
| 45% (90/198) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 47% (27/58) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 48% (11/23) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 25% (3/12) |
| 47% (16/34) | Deciding Set Win % | 30% (3/10) |
| 86% (93/80) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 81% (32/26) |
| 14% (93/13) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 19% (32/6) |
| 10% (109/11) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 4% (28/1) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
